RPC Bulletin #89, June 2025

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in June 2025. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Safer Parks Police Panel coming to an end +++ Cyclist knocked down by dog off lead +++ Check out our list of club rides in the park +++ 

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Forge 1860Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports

LONG GOODBYE

The farewell to the park’s police force has begun. As we mentioned in passing last month, the gradual dismantling of the Operational Command Unit to help plug the Met’s funding gap will be completed by the start of November – and now Sgt Pete Sturgess, who leads the park’s policing team, has told us that next month’s meeting of the Safer Parks Police Panel will be the last. 

Long-time subscribers will know that the panel is where the police set their priorities for the quarter-year. In the past, we have got them to focus on catching motorists who have ignored no-entry signs on the roads or exceeded the speed limit. But with Sgt Pete’s officers slowly leaving the unit to take up policing jobs elsewhere, he may not have the staff to fulfil whatever priorities are set by us and the other members of the SPPP, which is why he has now sensibly chosen to pull the plug.

Another panel is likely to be set up by one of the wards neighbouring the park, and we should be invited to join, but it remains to be seen whether it will be as easy or effective for us and other stakeholders to set policing priorities when there is no longer a dedicated unit. And while the police have committed to responding to 999 calls from the park, there is concern that policing will be less proactive in finding breaches of the law and the park regulations, such as keeping an eye out for speeding motorists and unauthorised trade vehicles. Hopefully more will become clear at the next panel meeting.

OFF-LEAD INVESTIGATORS

A timely example has emerged of the useful work carried out by the park’s police which may not necessarily happen when they are replaced.

Last Sunday a dog off a lead, which was chasing a deer, ran out into the road on Sawyer’s Hill and knocked over a cyclist, who suffered broken ribs and injuries to her head. An ambulance took her away and she is believed to be still in hospital. The park’s regulations state that all dogs should be on leads at this time of year – but the ambulance crew did not report the incident to the police as no motor vehicles were involved.

Thankfully, the cyclist’s husband contacted the park’s police and they are now liaising with him. An officer is currently advising the man to report the incident and submit footage from a video camera which the cyclist had running when the dog collided with her.

Without a dedicated team to speak to and chase up incidents like this, it might not be as straightforward to get them reported, and therefore recorded as data. We thank the park’s police for attempting to make sure that this collision, and others like it, are recorded in their official  statistics.

CLUBBED TOGETHER

Quite a while ago, we asked clubs and groups to submit details of rides that they run in Richmond Park which we could publicise on our website – then we became distracted by our discussions with The Royal Parks and the removal of the park’s police unit. Now, however, we’ve finally got round to publishing them.

The rides are now listed on the new Frequently Asked Questions page on our website. You can find it here.

Many thanks to all the clubs who contributed. If you would like to add your ride to the list, please email us. More cycling-related questions and answers will appear on the page in due course.

TWINNING RIDE

Next weekend, Richmond celebrates 65 years of being twinned with both Fontainebleau in France and Konstanz in Germany. There is a whole series of events, including a ride organised by our friends at Richmond Cycling Campaign. All the events are shown on the council’s site, and RCC is inviting locals to join their ride on June 7. Sign up here if you’re interested. 

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #88, May 2025

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in May 2025. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ The Royal Parks target speed with its cycling code of conduct +++ Our rundown of incidents attended by the police +++ Watch the birdies – there’s a goose on the loose! +++ 

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Forge 1860, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports

CODED MESSAGE

The Royal Parks has finally published its cycling code of conduct for its entire estate more than ten months after commencing discussions with us. It will be part of a campaign run over the spring and summer, and new signage is also being introduced in the parks. 

The code’s general ethos of showing considerate behaviour towards other park visitors is laudable, and we are pleased that the text reflects many of our recommendations. Unfortunately, however, the wording we asked for concerning speed was rejected by The Royal Parks. 

The final version of the code specifically states: “Do not ride in excess of 20mph in any circumstance.” This new stipulation is unenforceable, as there are no legal speed limits for cyclists on any UK roads. And by shifting the focus away from safety and on to speed, TRP is in danger of making the thousands of ordinary folk who choose to cycle in its parks seem like a significant threat to the public, which they are not.

It is worth remembering that the police do not use speed in itself as a measure of danger. There would have to be an additional aggravating factor, such as weaving around motor vehicles while passing them on a descent, or failing to slow down when a pedestrian is crossing, for you to fall foul of the park’s officers – and you could get pulled over in such circumstances if you were going under 20mph on the loop road. 

Apprehending the small number of selfish and dangerous cyclists is of course something we fully support. But ONS statistics show that pedestrian deaths involving cyclists are incredibly rare, with only 12 occurring nationally in four years. Morever, as our friends at the London Cycling Campaign have already noted: “The biggest cause of road danger to anyone inside a royal park remains drivers.” TRP should have a code of conduct for everyone who uses its roads, not just cyclists.

The focus on 20mph inevitably threatens the park’s two time trials and the London Duathlon ever coming back following their suspension last year. To reinstate them would seem to contradict TRP’s own code. Nevertheless, we will continue to argue for their return, as they are of huge value to the sports cycling community and, more importantly, none of the events have ever had any serious safety issues.

In the meantime, as the Standard reported, TRP is also actively seeking to go further by implementing enforceable speed limits through a proposed change to its regulations – but this process requires consultation and a vote in Parliament, which could result in it being rejected, and is likely to take years. 

How it would be enforced is another matter – as regular readers of this bulletin know, the park’s police unit is being disbanded to save money, and it remains to be seen if the enforcement of regulations will be as diligent as it is at present (although we do know, following a letter this week from the Met to us and other members of the Safer Parks Police Panel, that the unit will be replaced by local neighbourhood teams by November 1).

In any case, TRP’s code is nowhere near as extensive as our own Safer Riding Guide, which gives a more complete overview of considerate cycling, covering many important aspects such as riding two abreast which TRP’s five brief paragraphs do not mention. We will continue to promote our SRG for the benefit of Richmond Park.

In the unlikely event you are stopped or harassed regarding your speed within Richmond Park, remain calm and courteous, acknowledge any concerns politely, but know your legal rights. 

If you cycle safely and considerately, above or below the motor vehicle speed limit, you are not breaking the law.

REPORT RUNDOWN

Here’s our regular look at incidents on the park’s roads and the Tamsin Trail that the police have attended. As ever, this information comes from the report presented to the Safer Parks Police Panel, which we sit on, and we are the only organisation to publish these accounts. Note that our last quarterly meeting was a month later than usual, so the following is shorter than usual as it only covers a two-month period.

  • There was a single bike theft. In February, a suspect on an electric bike stole a bicycle and bag whilst the victim was sitting in a tree between Stag Lodge and Pen Ponds.

  • As first reported in our March bulletin, there was a major crash in February involving three vehicles between Kingston Gate and Ham Cross. This was caused by one of the drivers suffering a medical episode leading them to swerve across the road, colliding with two oncoming vehicles. The ensuing aftermath attended by the London Fire Brigade was dramatic, but thankfully no life-changing injuries resulted.

  • In March, there were two incidents constituting public order offences. On Sawyer’s Hill a suspect on a bike verbally abused a driver after they seemingly drove dangerously close to them. The cyclist then tried to remove the driver's car keys, failed to do so and rode away. Also, a cyclist riding off-track was shouted at by a dog walker who stood over her and prodded her shoulder whilst his dogs were barking at them. On the Middle Road, a motorist caused a cyclist to swerve off the narrow road and fall, causing bruising, a sprained wrist, grazes and swelling to the right knee, right elbow and right hand. And on Roehempton Roundabout, a cyclist fell, breaking their hip and fracturing their pelvis. The London Fire Brigade attended as there were reports as on previous weather related occasions of a slippery surface, evidence of which was not found but as a precaution, the surface was washed and treated.

Traffic offences and relevant breaches of park regulations were as follows:

Trade vehicles – 93

Unauthorised parking/unattended – 66

Driving not on a road – 18

Speed – 30

Off-track cycling – 2

Contravening signs (including closed roads) – 2

Cycling to endanger any person – 0

Driving a vehicle to endanger any person – 4

Driving without due care – 0

Using a mobile while driving – 0

No valid license – 1

No insurance – 5

No cycle lights after dark – 0

Faulty vehicle lights – 0

No MOT – 0

This quarter’s priorities for policing, set at the meeting, are pedestrian safety (courtesy crossings, middle road, and gravel bikes on the Tamsin Trail), cycling safety (Beverly Brook obedience and motorist behaviour) and wildlife protection (deer protection, dogs around skylark fields and barbecues).

GOOSE BUMPED

Watch out for the geese. We’ve seen them having a lovely time on Broomfield Hill recently, with a few nonchalantly sitting in the road at the top and the bottom of the climb while we’ve been enjoying the park on weekday mornings. 

Now a subscriber tells us that one took flight from the grass as he was descending and, unable to swerve in time, he hit the fast-moving waterfowl, resulting in him coming off his bike. He ended up with a broken hip, road rash on his legs and a nine-day stay in hospital which included surgery. The goose appears to have scarpered unscathed.

Our subscriber would like to show his gratitude to the strangers who stuck around, calling an ambulance and his wife while he lay injured. “I wouldn't have got through that ordeal without them,” he says, “and it was a good reminder of how many kind people there are out there.” So if you are Felix, Alex or Bepia, or a midwife or an off-duty police officer, and you were at the scene of the accident on Sunday, April 13, consider yourself thanked by an on-the-mend cyclist. 

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #87, April 2025

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Update on TRP cycling policy review and code of conduct +++ Possibility of ANPR on park roads +++ Cyclists falling on slippery roundabouts +++ Take part in Richmond council’s transport consultation +++ Another chance to get your bike on national database for free +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Forge 1860Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports

ENCOURAGING SIGNS

After almost nine months, our discussions with The Royal Parks regarding its revised cycling policy and a new code of conduct for cyclists are progressing well. 

We are pleased that TRP’s Director of Parks, Darren Share, and his colleagues appear close to completing a draft – prepared with input from ourselves, Regent’s Park Cyclists and the London Cycling Campaign – to submit to their board of trustees.

Together with our own Safer Riding Guide, we are confident that the wording adopted by TRP will reflect the Highway Code and encourage respectful behavioural change among the minority of cyclists who are inclined to ride inconsiderately.

CAMERA FOCUS

The future of policing in the park is still unclear following Sgt Pete Sturgess’s announcement in February that it is “99 percent certain” his unit will be dissolved by the end of the year to help plug the Met’s £450million funding gap

The Safer Park’s Police Panel, which we sit on, wrote to senior police last month seeking assurances that whatever replaces the park’s Operational Command Unit will continue to focus on patrolling the roads, general speed checks on motorists and other vital police work. Superintendent Owen Renowden from The Royal Parks OCU responded, assuring the panel that the points raised in the letter are “key considerations in any future decisions” without explaining what might replace his unit.

But the uncertainty has opened up the possibility that some of the unit’s traffic work could be replaced by Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras. Trade vehicles and other unauthorised vehicles as well as speeding motorists could all be caught if ANPR is intelligently applied.

Of course, if through traffic was banned – which remains our key policy – there would be no need for any kind of road traffic cameras. But in the meantime, with looming budget cuts to the police, technology could provide a solution to the perennial problem of catching errant motorists who disturb the enjoyment of the park for many people.

ON THE SLIDE

Take care on the park’s roundabouts. A number of cyclists have been sliding off on them, even though the roads have been swept.

On Friday, March 7, we received a report of seven riders who fell over during a 20-minute period at Richmond Gate roundabout – one of whom broke their thumb. The roads were swept on Wednesday 17 – but on the following Saturday, there were a number of cyclists who hit the deck on Richmond, Kingston and Roehampton roundabouts. Similar incidents during wintertime have been reported in previous editions of this bulletin.

Park manager Paul Richards says that the London Fire Brigade applied some material to Roehampton Gate as a precaution as there was a report of an oil spill but there was “nothing evident”.

There have been no further falls that we know of, and the weather has been warmer and drier lately which usually means the roads become less slippery. Nevertheless, the park management is monitoring the situation, so please let us know if you encounter any treacherous conditions.  

PIN POINTS

Richmond council wants to hear your opinions on transport conditions in the borough – and that includes the park.

Head over to its interactive map and simply drop a pin on any area you would like to comment on. You can read the points that have already been raised about the park’s roadway by selecting the relevant spots, which are colour-coded to denote positive as well as negative views. So feel free to say nice things if you want!

The council says the feedback will shape its plan to deliver long-term sustainable and inclusive transport improvements in the borough over the next 15 years. You can sign up for updates, and you have until next month to offer feedback.

HEAD TO THE HOOD

The police’s next bike marking event is taking place on Saturday, April 12 – and for the first time, the location will be Robin Hood Gate.

As always, you won’t have to pay a penny to put your pride and joy on the National Cycle Database. Registering your bicycle is a deterrent to thieves – and if it is nicked, you stand a much better chance of getting it back. 

The police have yet to confirm the time, so we will post it on our social media once we know. Our thanks once again to Sgt Sturgess and Met officers for organising this useful service.

CRASH UPDATE

Finally, a quick update on the three-car crash that took place on Queen’s Road shortly before our March bulletin came out. 

One of the drivers involved reportedly had a medical emergency and lost consciousness, hitting the two other vehicles. They were travelling at around 20mph.

Despite the dramatic scenes as the fire brigade cut the roof off the car, there were no life-changing or threatening injuries.

We posted this info on our social media a few days after the last mailout. The police have now confirmed the crash is still under investigation, so there is no further information for the time being. We’ll let you know when we have more details.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #86, March 2025

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in March 2025. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.


IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Three injured in major crash +++ Police unit “99 percent certain” to be canned +++ Move to stop commuters using Kingston Gate car park +++ What to do if you’re brought down by a dog off a lead +++ Why flight path change might spoil your enjoyment of the park +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Forge 1860Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports

MAJOR CRASH

Three vehicles were involved in a serious collision on Queen’s Road in Richmond Park on Friday morning. Three people were taken to hospital for urgent treatment and the road between Kingston Gate and Ham Cross was closed. We received an unconfirmed report that emergency services had to cut the roof off one of the cars to rescue a passenger.

News regarding this incident came in while putting together this newsletter, so we don’t currently have further details. When we do, we’ll post more on social media. In the meantime, you can read a news report here.

COPS STOPPED

Having been targeted by the Met for the axe to help fill a £450million funding gap, the fate of the park’s police now appears to be sealed. 

The unit’s sergeant Pete Sturgess announced to Richmond Park Cyclists and other members of the Safer Parks Police Panel on a Zoom call two weeks ago that it is “99 percent certain” his team will be dissolved some time between April and December. He confirmed no officers would be made redundant, but none of the unit know where they will be redeployed, nor what form of policing will replace them.

The following week, at the panel’s scheduled quarterly meeting, RPC and the other stakeholders present decided to write to Chief Superintendent Clair Kelland, who is in charge of policing for south-west London, seeking assurances that whatever replaces the park’s Operational Command Unit will continue to focus on vital areas of police work in the park. The final draft of the letter is currently being written by panel chair Dr Fionna Moore.

The main assurance that RPC is seeking is that the SPPP will continue. As long-time subscribers may know, the panel’s quarterly meetings give us the opportunity to set priorities for the police which benefit cyclists, such as targeting speeding motorists shortcutting through the park in the morning. We also want the police to maintain a visible presence, patrol the roads and continue with general speed checks. 

But with fewer resources and manpower, one obvious way to mitigate the reduction in policing is to close the park to through traffic, which takes considerable time and effort to police, particularly in the case of unauthorised trade vehicles which enter the gates in huge numbers. Could this significant change eventually prompt The Royal Parks to stop cut-through journeys for a trial period (which, of course, is one of our long-term goals)?

LIMITING FACTOR

The dissolution of the park’s police unit may also impact The Royal Parks’ aim to introduce a speed limit for cyclists across its estate. 

As we stated in our November bulletin, it already seemed unlikely that the Government would have the inclination to bring in such a law specifically for London’s royal parks, which only have a few dozen miles of roadway between them, when limits don’t apply to the hundreds of thousands of miles of British roads. Now, with the park’s police unit canned and no plan from the Met on what will replace it, how a limit would be policed is even less clear. 

This is one area we would like to explore with Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, when we see him on Monday to resume discussions on their review of cycling policy after our meeting in December had to be postponed.

REPORT RUNDOWN

Time for our regular look at the incidents on the park’s roads and the Tamsin Trail that the police have attended. For the benefit of newer subscribers to this bulletin, this information is usually collated over a quarterly period and is presented to the Safer Parks Police Panel, which we sit on alongside the park manager, local councillors and other stakeholders. Our quarterly meeting was a month later than usual, so this report is for a four-month period.

  • There was a single bike theft. In October, an employee working at Pembroke Lodge had their lock cut and bicycle stolen. 

  • In October a driver cut the roundabout at Robin Hood Gate and hit a cyclist who was approaching from Broomfield Hill resulting in the cyclist sustaining a broken wrist and fractured collar bone. The cyclist did not wish to support a prosecution, so no further action was taken. (For more detail and our opinion, see our November 2024 newsletter.) A cyclist travelling at 10pm on the roadway past The Royal Ballet School collided with a deer and sustained a fractured pelvis, sacrum and pubic bone, broken three ribs, fractured their left clavicle and suffered a hemotoma on their bladder.

  • In November between Roehampton Gate and Priory Lane a cyclist clipped the rear wheel of another cyclist in front of him, lost control and fell, breaking their collarbone and sustaining a deep laceration to their head, plus concussion. At Robin Hood Roundabout a cyclist fell, losing consciousness with no memory of the incident. Nobody else was involved and it was therefore believed to be a “medical incident”. The rider suffered abrasions and cuts to their face and knees.

  • In December a cyclist travelling up a short steep hill had their chain buckle, causing their foot to slip. Falling forward, they went over their handlebars, sustaining a deep cut to the right side of their forehead, stiffness to their right hip, pain to their right hand and grazing to their right shoulder.

  • In January a car driver overtook a cyclist on Broomfield Hill. The cyclist chased after the driver near the Broomfield Hill car park and hit their wing mirror and possibly the bonnet. The cyclist turned to ride off and the motorist hit the cyclist's rear wheel causing the rider to fall – no injury sustained.

Traffic offences and relevant breaches of park regulations were as follows:

Trade vehicles – 231

Unauthorised parking/unattended – 88

Driving not on a road - 33

Speed – 81

Off-track cycling – 2

Contravening signs (including closed roads) – 15

Cycling to endanger any person – 0

Driving a vehicle to endanger any person – 6

Driving without due care – 0

Using a mobile while driving – 1

No valid license – 1

No insurance – 8

No cycle lights after dark – 1

Faulty vehicle lights – 0

No MOT - 1

This Quarter’s Priorities 

As suggested by the police team, this quarter’s priorities over and above general policing are as follows:

1. Pedestrian Safety (Courtesy Crossings, Middle Road and gravel bikes on the Tamsin Trail)

2. Cycling safety (Beverly Brook obedience and motorist behaviour)

3. Wildlife protection (Deer protection, dogs around skylark fields)

GOOD MORNINGS

If you ride through the park on your morning commute or are able to enjoy a few laps before breakfast, you might notice that there will be slightly fewer cars around from next week.

Starting on Monday, Kingston Gate car park will be closed until 9am on weekdays to prevent drivers parking up and continuing their journey to work by public transport or on foot. The car park has filled up in the morning for many years as it is free as well as being relatively close to Norbiton station, Kingston town centre and the local hospital, so the later opening should discourage some commuters from using the park as a convenient spot to leave their cars. Weekend parking will be unaffected, and Blue Badge holders can use all the other car parks.

We are not typically in the park every weekday morning, so please let us know if you detect a difference. Our thanks to park manager Paul Richards for instituting this much-needed change.

DOGGED PURSUIT OF JUSTICE

Two contrasting stories concerning dogs off leads. The day after the Safer Parks Police Panel, a man was due to appear before Wimbledon Magistrates on the charge of “allowing a dog to chase, worry or injure another animal”. His pet had attacked a deer in December, and after an appeal, members of the public were able to identify him from video filmed at the scene which was distributed by the media.

Meanwhile, news reached us that a member of Richmond Park Rouleurs suffered a broken arm last month after a dog, which was not on a lead, ran out into the road and collided with her. The owner was apologetic and got an ear-bashing from onlookers, but that was it. As the victim’s priority was to get to hospital, she did not take the dog owner’s details.

The second incident is far more typical than the first, yet they often go unreported, which makes it less likely that the police can recognise the scale of the problem and focus on it. So if you are brought down by an errant hound while riding, call 101 to report the incident, no matter how scant the details, or dial 999 if the injury is serious. Obtain the dog owner’s details for any insurance claim.

Remember: any failure to control a dog could be an offence under three sections of the park’s regulations. One – Section 3(5) – would apply if an officer asks the person with the animal to place it on a lead; the other two state that a visitor to the park should not “intentionally or recklessly interfere with the safety, comfort or convenience of any person” (Section 3 (1)) or “cause or permit any animal or bird of which he is in charge to chase, worry, or injure any other animal or bird” (Section 4 (21)).

GETTING TO THE PARK

Richmond Council is starting a new consultation on its Transport Strategy, which you can look at here. If you ride to or from Richmond Park through the borough, please take a moment to look at their map here and tell them which parts of the route you’d like improved, or indeed which parts you really like. 

PLANE CRAZY

The Government’s backing for a third runway at Heathrow airport has revived concerns about the environmental impact more flights would cause – but as we first pointed out way back in  August 2019, it is the proposed redesign of the flight paths that will have a big and more immediate impact on the peace and tranquility of Richmond Park, regardless of whether or not planes get more tarmac.

Noisy departing aircraft which currently skirt the park may soon fly directly overhead, as Heathrow stealthily pushes ahead with its long-running project to use technology that will enable take-offs and landings on the same runway and in both directions from both runways.  This will enable Heathrow Airport to increase its number of flights as well as re-routing noisy departures over the park, all without the third runway.

To keep abreast of Heathrow Airport's proposals, and to learn how to object, sign up to the Friends of Richmond Park's regular bulletins here

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #85, February 2025

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in February 2025. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.


IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Deer cull back again – and it starts TONIGHT +++ Seen suspected bike-jackers? Report them! +++ Three park-related offences to be added to Road Traffic Offenders Act +++ Where and when – tell us about your group rides +++ 

Visit our sponsors: Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Forge 1860Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports

BACK WITH A BANG

It doesn’t seem that long since the final deer cull of 2024 ended – and now the faint, distant sound of gunshot is about to drift through the nighttime air around Richmond Park once more.

Throughout the next seven weeks, starting from TONIGHT, the gates close at 8pm and reopen at 7.30am – which means, for your own safety, you will not be able to ride your bike in the park during those times. 

The usual rules apply. If you arrive shortly before closing time, please do not enter unless you are absolutely certain you can easily reach your exit before 8pm – otherwise you may find yourself temporarily locked in. Similarly, in the morning, you may find your chosen entrance open before 7.30am – but your exit could still be closed when you get to it. For more details, see our website.

MAKE THAT CALL

There has been another wave of bike-jackings near Regent’s Park – and although no similar crimes have taken place in Richmond Park recently, we have received disturbing reports of suspicious groups riding high-powered e-bikes, some of them with bladed weapons visible. 

One rider tells us they often seem to be present between Roehampton Gate, where they enter the park, and Kingston Gate. Meanwhile, on the Tamsin Trail, a female cyclist was targeted two weeks ago by three balaclava-clad youths, one on a souped-up e-bike and another on a moped, who scattered after she flagged down a female stranger, pretending that she was a friend (an effective tactic should you find yourself in this situation).

Despite much discussion among cyclists on social media, the police tell us no one has informed them directly of any sightings or incidents – which is why we would urge you to file a report if you have witnessed or experienced anything they should know about.

  • To report an incident or anything suspicious, call 101

  • You can also fill in a report online here (this link is also in the bio of our Instagram, Twitter and Facebook).

  • We have permission to give the mobile number of the park’s police unit to group leaders of clubs who ride regularly in the park. Get in touch if you feel it would be useful (although please note officers are not able to answer calls if they are already dealing with an incident).

  • If you are in danger, call 999.

The police recommend that, if you are being followed, you should go to a heavily populated area, such as one of the cafes in the park – and in the event of a confrontation, hand over your bike to the thieves rather than risk serious injury or worse.

The last sustained spate of violent bike thefts took place almost four years ago, and the roads in Richmond Park are generally far safer than those outside it. Nevertheless, if you do see anything suspicious, please contact the police – it is the only way to escalate patrols.

DUE COURSES

The Home Office has announced proposed legislation for a raft of cycling offences which will be dealt with by fines or courses – three of which apply specifically to the Royal Parks. They are:

  • Failure to comply with any direction given by a constable or by a notice exhibited by order of the Secretary of State regarding the use of a pedal cycle in a Royal Park or other specified land.                                                 

  • Using a pedal cycle in [a] manner that endangers or is likely to endanger any person in a Royal Park or other specified land.       

  • Using a vehicle or pedal cycle between sunset and sunrise, or in seriously reduced visibility between sunrise and sunset, with no lights in a Royal Park or other specified land.

You can read the full list by clicking here and scrolling down.

The above additions to the Road Traffic Offenders Act are already covered by our Safer Riding Guide, so we welcome the move to deal with the small minority who persist in riding discourteously or unsafely. But all three aspects are also covered by the park regulations, so it would seem the police are now being given the option to use fines or courses as a punishment instead of dishing out warnings or pursuing matters through the courts. We will consult with Sgt Pete Sturgess from the park’s police unit to find out more.

There is also the matter of how the offences would be policed, given that Sgt Sturgess’s team is under threat due to the Met having to find money to plug a £450million funding gap. The unit could be cut to half its size or disbanded, in which case its officers would be deployed elsewhere and responsibility for the park given to local wards. 

We value our good relations with the park’s police, the knowledge base that they have built up over the years aided by their low turnover of staff, and the hard work they have put in to keep the park safe. We are very concerned about how well Richmond Park will be policed without a dedicated command unit but will work with whoever is in charge of policing in the future. A decision is due within weeks. 

GROUP WORK

Our ongoing but slow-moving discussions with The Royal Parks regarding changes to its cycling policy and a proposed 20mph limit for cyclists has meant that a few projects fell by the wayside. One of them was putting information about group rides in the park on our website – but we’re back on the case.

If you run a regular ride in the park, please send us the details, stating when you meet and where, and if you have a group for beginners, along with a link to all the relevant information. We aim to get the list up by the end of the month.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #84, January 2025

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in January 2025. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Happy New Year! +++ Parks’ police target for cuts +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Richmond Park Rouleurs, Sigma Sports


HAPPY NEW YEAR!

We’re officially on a break over the festive period, so this is a much shorter monthly newsletter than usual – but we couldn’t begin 2025 without thanking all our subscribers for your support in 2024. There wouldn’t be a Richmond Park Cyclists without you. Our thanks also to park manager Paul Richards, the park’s police and The Royal Parks for their help and engagement with us.

At some point in the next few weeks we will meet again with Director of Parks Darren Share to continue discussions concerning The Royal Parks’ plan to revamp its cycling policy and establish a code of conduct for cyclists. Our aim is to better reflect a realistic approach to regulating cyclists’ speeds and behaviour, while also prioritising the safety of pedestrians and cyclists. Hopefully we will have news to share when this bulletin resumes normal service at the start of February.

UNIT COST

We also hope to have more information by the end of the month on the significant changes to the policing of Richmond Park. The Met has to plug a £450million funding gap, and one of the targets for cuts is the team that patrols the Royal Parks, which The Standard reports could have its resources “slashed”. There is also speculation elsewhere that the unit could be scrapped entirely, with the local force taking over responsibilities for Richmond and Bushy parks.

In an email sent to us and the other members of the Safer Parks Police Panel, the unit’s Inspector Nick McLaughlin said discussions regarding funding are ongoing and no officers will be made redundant. We are likely to learn more when we meet with his sergeant, Pete Sturgess, for our regular quarterly catch-up this month, and at the next Safer Parks meeting towards the end of February.

Sgt Sturgess and his team do a great job catching speeding motorists, stopping drivers of unauthorised trade vehicles and policing many other misdemeanours which can have an impact on the enjoyment of cycling in the park. When we have asked him to prioritise certain offences, such as drivers entering the car-free areas of the roadway during the Movement Strategy trials, he has always been happy to oblige. And the park’s officers are generally fair when it comes to dealing with inconsiderate cycling. There is no guarantee as yet that the local force could be as effective and as focused on the park, as it will, naturally, have to continue policing the surrounding boroughs as well. So we would prefer continuity rather than change, especially as we have built up a good relationship with Sgt Pete over the years. Nevertheless, we are ready to work with whichever police body is responsible for keeping the park safe for cyclists and every other visitor in the future.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

Thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox over the past year, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists


RPC Bulletin #83, December 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in December 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Our response to newspaper’s overblown claims about cycling in Richmond Park +++ The Royal Parks draft new cycling policy and code of conduct +++ Follow us on Bluesky

Visit our sponsors: BellaVelo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

FAULTY TELE

The Daily Telegraph – which previously breached the Editors’ Code with a laughably untrue claim that ordinary cyclists are riding faster on UK roads than Olympic track champions – has now published more overblown worries about cycling in Richmond Park and The Royal Parks’ other green spaces. 

Using the Freedom of Information Act, it obtained specific data from TRP which only lists incidents involving cyclists colliding with pedestrians or other cyclists, or (in one instance) damaging a car during an altercation. A map accompanying the report identified just six such cases in Richmond Park over the past four years – exceptionally few in relation to the hundreds of thousands of miles cycled on its roadway annually – and, of course, there are none of the alarming incidents involving motorists that the police continually record in their official statistics, which we detail in full every three months in this bulletin. 

Some things are best left to wither behind a paywall. But if you really want to see the newspaper’s report for yourself, we have liberated most of it here.

A day after the Telegraph’s report appeared, one of its columnists took up the cudgels, and we submitted this response, which was published last Sunday:

SIR – Simon Heffer says that it’s time to “get tough on the scourge of rogue cyclists” (Comment, November 17). As a campaigner, and someone who cycles around London virtually every day, I’ve seen people cycling in all sorts of ways in our city. I’m also in Richmond Park nearly every day. Cyclists aren’t angels, but they’re no less law abiding than anyone else in this country.

Mr Heffer’s essential argument seems to be one that has been rejected by government after government, in the UK and abroad: that somehow, if we made everyone on a bicycle have a specific licence and register their vehicle, then the world would be a safer place. Yet drivers, with their licences, tests, MOTs, and insurance, don’t seem to be persuaded of this, killing more people in a day than cyclists kill in a year.

The law should absolutely be enforced, and used to prevent road violence, but the changes Mr Heffer proposes would make no difference to safety on our roads and pavements, and instead would reduce the number of people cycling, to the detriment of all.

Tim Lennon

Richmond Cycling Campaign and Richmond Park Cyclists

London SW14

SPEED DRAFTING

It was, as many of you are aware, the selective coverage of the pedestrian fatality in Regent’s Park by the Telegraph and other papers that led to The Royal Parks deciding to review its cycling policy and establish a code of conduct for cyclists across its estate. Following our initial meetings with Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, we now have drafts of both documents and have suggested changes after reviewing the wording with our friends from Regent’s Park Cyclists and the London Cycling Campaign. Our aim is to better reflect a realistic approach to regulating cyclists’ speeds and behaviour in the Royal Parks, while also prioritising the safety of pedestrians and cyclists. We will meet with Darren again in December and look forward to continuing our discussions with him.

Following news in our last bulletin that TRP has written to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, we have received indications from more than one source at a high level that TRP’s proposal to have a specific 20mph speed limit for cyclists across the Royal Parks will be difficult to pursue, given the priorities of the Government. This will undoubtedly be another topic of discussion with Darren.

BLUE START

Have you flown to Bluesky yet? We will still be posting on Twitter for the foreseeable future, but with many users fleeing, our posts have also started to appear on its rival service. You can follow us on @richmondpkcyclists.bsky.social.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #82, November 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in November 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Deer cull starts tonight +++ Can 20mph limit for cyclists be introduced?  +++ Action taken on blind spot by car park  +++ Three frightening incidents involving motorists +++ Rundown of quarterly police stats +++

Visit our sponsors: BellaVelo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

CULL TIME

Before this newsletter begins in earnest, a quick reminder that the park will be closed to everyone from 8pm TONIGHT as the biannual deer cull commences for the usual seven-week period. If you arrive at the park shortly before closing time, please do not enter unless you are absolutely certain you can easily reach your exit before 8pm – otherwise you may find yourself temporarily locked in. The gates officially reopen at 7.30am each day. For more details, see our website.

LIMITED APPEAL

Can The Royal Parks succeed in imposing a unilateral 20mph speed limit on cyclists in Richmond Park and its other green spaces? It doesn’t seem that likely to us.

There was surprise among many cyclists, including us at RPC, when it emerged two weeks ago that TRP has written to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport requesting a change to its regulations so that the maximum speed limit of 20mph could apply to cyclists as well as motorists. The move comes after the negative media coverage, and subsequent public outrage, surrounding the inquest into the pedestrian fatality in Regent’s Park two years ago which involved a cyclist. 

Any changes to the park’s regulations can take a long time to implement, or may not even make it through Parliament. Moreover, the existing regs are clear, easily enforceable, and actually quite stringent: as we make clear in our Safer Riding Guide, they stipulate that “you must not ride in a manner that would endanger the safety of other park visitors or yourself” – and you can be stopped by the police for cycling inconsiderately even if you are moving at less than 20mph. Any attempt to impose a speed limit on cyclists is a distraction from what TRP should be focussing on – the effect of cars in its parks, particularly through traffic. (A number of worrying incidents in the past month, which feature in one of the items below, illustrate this point.

It’s also notable that when the Highway Code was updated, speed limits for cyclists on Britain’s roads were never on the cards. Two years later, would the Government now have the inclination to impose a limit on the few dozen miles of roadway across the Royal Parks, given that they don’t apply to the 246,000 miles of GB roads? And would it have the appetite to get involved when there are so many bigger and unprecedented national challenges to tackle?

In a few days, we are meeting with Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, for the second time. Our series of meetings, as regular subscribers to this bulletin will know, concern the development of a new cycling policy for his organisation – and he assures us it will be guided by data. We are confident that, ultimately, TRP will look at the evidence and see that cyclists in its parks do not pose a significant threat to anyone’s safety, and a 20mph limit will not make its roads any safer.

LOGGING ON

A word of appreciation for park manager Paul Richards, who has taken action on a hazardous blindspot.

While one of us from RPC was cycling down Dark Hill a couple of months ago, a motorist exiting the car park near Kingston Gate pulled out in front of us, necessitating a quick pull on the brake levers to prevent a collision. Neither we nor the driver could see each other because the view was obscured by a vehicle which was parked at the corner on the edge of the exit. But after contacting Paul about this incident, his team has placed logs on the same spot to prevent motorists inconsiderately using it as a parking space. 

Our thanks to him for this. In a separate development, Paul tells us that parts of the Tamsin Trail, which subscribers have flagged for their poor state, are being monitored for future improvements to the path’s surface.

REPORT RUNDOWN

Time for our regular look at the incidents on the park’s roads and the Tamsin Trail that the police have attended. (For the benefit of newer subscribers to this bulletin, this information is collated over a quarterly period and is presented to the Safer Parks Police Panel, which we sit on alongside the park manager, local councillors and other stakeholders.)

  • In July, there were two collisions on Queen’s Road. The first involved a cyclist overtaking a motorist and resulted in a fractured pelvis, while the second led to a rider suffering a broken ankle after a driver turned to go towards Pen Ponds car park. Elsewhere, a cyclist came off worse when they collided with a pedestrian on Dark Hill, leaving them with a broken elbow, ribs and a hairline fracture. In the same month, there were four crashes which were either cyclist-on-cyclist or did not involve any other party, with all but one resulting in cuts and abrasions. The exception was a cyclist who broke their leg in a collision on Priory Lane after an oncoming rider clipped the wheel of a person they were riding with and swerved into their path.

  • In August, there were two solo cyclist crashes on Sawyer’s Hill and Dark Hill respectively, with the second suffering a fractured hip after their chain snapped. There was also a head-on collision involving two cyclists at Ham Gate, resulting in grazing and cuts.

  • In September, a cyclist and a motorist collided after they both pulled out of the junction at Ham Cross at the same time. The cyclist, who suffered shock, landed on the car’s windscreen and broke it. The cyclist and the motorist exchanged details.

Traffic offences and relevant breaches of park regulations were as follows: 

Trade vehicles – 235

Unauthorised parking/unattended – 78

Driving not on a road – 45

Speed – 36

Off-track cycling – 9

Contravening signs (including closed roads) – 5

Cycling to endanger any person – 2

Driving a vehicle to endanger any person – 0

Driving without due care – 0

Using a mobile while driving – 1

No valid license – 2

No insurance – 3

No cycle lights after dark – 1

Faulty vehicle lights – 1

As part of their priorities for the current quarter-year, the police will continue to send traffic officers to the park on some weekday mornings to keep an eye out for speeding motorists, which was a request we originally made at the previous panel meeting in July. Our thanks to Sgt Sturgess from the park’s police for continuing this initiative.

TRIPLE THREAT

More recently, in the space of little more than a week, there have been three frightening  incidents that weren’t presented to the Safer Parks panel as they took place outside the three-month timeframe of the police report (and the third was not reported).

  • On October 10, a driver tried to overtake two cars on Queen’s Road between Ham Cross and Pembroke Lodge, then swerved to avoid an oncoming car, careered off-road and hit a tree. The park’s police have recommended that the motorist, who was using his brother’s car, be charged with driving with no insurance and without due care.

  • The second incident occurred five days later near Robin Hood Gate. A motorist on Priory Lane turned right towards the Pen Ponds car park, cutting across the roundabout and hitting a cyclist who had come down Broomfield Hill. The cyclist was struck with such force that his pedal went through the car’s bodywork, and the top tube of his bike snapped. He and the driver were shaken by the collision, and the cyclist was taken to hospital. Although both parties believed they were each partly responsible – the driver said he had not seen the cyclist, and the cyclist admitted he had been going too fast – we know from making our own investigations prior to the incident that the plethora of infrastructure and large signs at sight level obscures and distracts road users from all directions, leading to avoidable dangerous manoeuvres like the ones made leading to this accident.

  • On October 18, one of our subscribers witnessed a driver in a grey SUV on the single-lane section across Beverly Brook Bridge overtake a group of cyclists at more than 40mph and then drive towards an oncoming rider who had to go off-road to avoid being hit head-on. The subscriber started a thread on Reddit about the frightening incident and, like us, many of the respondents agree that the park is no place for through traffic.

As we have said before, the incidence of dangerous and inconsiderate driving in the park is probably relatively lower than that of a busy London road. Nevertheless, addressing incidents like those above would do more to improve the safety of the park’s roads than trying to implement a speed limit for cyclists.


TRAIL AND TRIBULATION

On a final note, a polite reminder about two aspects of safety as we enter the winter months.

At this time of year, some of you may be taking to the Tamsin Trail more often as an alternative to road cycling. If you do, please ride considerately around other cyclists and those on foot. Pedestrians have priority, and on this relatively narrow trail, not all of them are mindful that they share the space with cyclists, so watch your speed. Some are elderly and may not hear you approach. Also look out for dogs and children.

Secondly, always use lights in the park at night and be mindful of hazards. Last week some people walking through the park found a cyclist on the ground after the rider hit a deer on the descent from the Ballet School at around 9.45pm. They required hospital treatment. Please take care at night so you don’t come a cropper as well.


SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #81, October 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in October 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ Royal Parks’ new chair removed – before starting job +++ Youths on mopeds may not be as suspicious as you think +++ Cyclist tailed by police buggy +++ Get your bike marked on your way into work +++

Visit our sponsors: Bella Velo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT DAME MARY…

All change at the top for The Royal Parks, with a dash of political intrigue, as Dame Mary Archer has been removed as chair of the organisation before she had even taken up the post.

The 79-year-old academic was given the job by the Conservative government in May, with the Daily Mail reporting at the time that the appointment was “rushed through 48 hours after the announcement of the General Election so it could not be vetoed by the Opposition”. Labour won on July 4, and Dame Mary’s four-year tenure, which was due to begin on July 24, was put on ice. Then, in mid-September, Lisa Nandy, the new Culture Secretary, officially announced that the Tory peer’s appointment had been cancelled – which an incoming government is able to do if the appointee has not yet started the job. Previous chair Loyd Grossman, who had been in post since 2016, will stay on until a permanent replacement is found. (Pointedly, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport noted that the former MasterChef judge could continue as he “has not declared any significant political activity”.)

Meanwhile, Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, postponed our second meeting with him due to “unavoidable changes in availability”. We understand that several dates have been marked for rescheduling – and we look forward to finding out what effect, if any, the removal of Dame Mary from the top job might have on TRP’s review of its cycling policy, which is our chief topic of discussion with Darren.

FALSE ALARM

Two years after the last spate of robberies, have violent bike thieves riding mopeds and e-bikes returned to the park? Thankfully not. It is true that there have been sightings of young men wearing face coverings while scooting around the park, but believe it or not, some of their activities turn out to be perfectly innocent when the police stop them to investigate. Sgt Pete Sturgess from the park’s police unit tells us one group who he spoke to seemed surprised that their presence was causing such concern.

Nevertheless, patrols from the Met’s Roads And Transport division will be visiting the park on a regular basis to keep an eye out and reassure the public. Everyone is encouraged to engage with them, so please speak to any officers you may see.

BUGGY SMALLS

Stop that cyclist! Unusual scenes on the park’s middle road last month, as Sgt Pete set off in his small all-terrain vehicle, with siren blaring and lights flashing, to stop a rider who was going rather too fast.

While the sight of a police buggy in pursuit of a cyclist may seem comical, it was justifiable and practical given the circumstances. Sgt Pete had witnessed the man riding at a brisk pace in close proximity to pedestrians, some of them children, as well as Lime bike riders who, as often inexperienced riders, can sometimes veer unpredictably. In this context, the cyclist was a potential hazard to others, and took his park regulation warning from Sgt Pete without complaint. The park’s police boss gave the same warnings to two other cyclists – and also stopped a motorist who said he was unaware that he was not permitted to drive on the middle road, which proved to be an unconvincing claim when it emerged he lives very close to Ham Gate. 

Park reg warnings are a fair means of addressing inappropriate speeds, as those stopped will only face further action if they are caught breaking regulations again within the following 12 months. And remember that the middle road is called the Quietway for a reason: as advised by our Safer Riding Guide, you should “give way to children, walkers and learner cyclists who frequent this mostly car-free area which runs through the centre of the park between Ham Cross and Sheen Cross.” It’s common-sense advice, and most cyclists follow it – so make sure you do too, lest you get a buggy on your tail.

DOUBLE MARKS

Calling all commuters – want to get your bike on the national security register, but you’re never in the park on weekends when marking events usually take place? Then stop by Sheen Cross from 8am on Friday, October 4, where Met officers will gladly mark up your pride and joy – and, as usual, you won’t have to pay a penny.

For those of you who would prefer to swing by after a few laps, another team will be at Ham Cross the next day – Saturday, October 5 – from 10am until 12pm.

Remember: putting your bike on the National Cycle Database is a deterrent to thieves – and if it does get nicked, the chances of your bicycle being returned to you should the police recover it are greatly increased.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists

RPC Bulletin #80, September 2024

Each month, we email a bulletin to everyone who has signed up on this site. Below is the edition that we sent in September 2024. If you like it, please sign up on our Get Involved section – you will be showing your support for our work and you will receive our free monthly bulletins a month before they appear here.

IN THIS ISSUE… +++ The reason why the London Duathlon was cancelled +++ Tell us about your group rides for newcomers +++ Speed humps removed near Kingston Gate… then replaced +++ Become a pilot rider for partially sighted cyclists +++ E-bike batteries fire hazard +++

Visit our sponsors: BellaVelo, Cycle Exchange, Kingston Wheelers, London Dynamo, Pearson Cycles, Richmond Cycles, Sigma Sports

RUN, BIKE, DONE

What scuppered the London Duathlon, which was due to take place in Richmond Park this month? As viewers of RPC’s TV debut on BBC London News on Sunday will have discovered, the cancellation of the popular annual event was directly due to the much-publicised pedestrian fatality two years ago – and ten miles away – in Regent’s Park, along with the more recent inquest into the elderly woman’s sad death.

The organisers of the run-bike-run event blamed “an increased focus on the security and logistics of cycling events in public spaces which creates significant operational challenges.” The Royal Parks, meanwhile, told BBC London that it “wanted to review cycling events in its parks following a minority of people cycling at excessive speeds”.

Both of these statements are couched in general terms. But TRP had previously issued an assurance that it had decided not to approve cycle sport events while it reviewed its cycling policy specifically as a result of the Regent’s fatality. It had already cancelled London Dynamo’s two time trials, which are each capped at 120 competitors; by its own logic, the world’s largest duathlon, with a maxiumum of 4,000 participants, had to suffer the same fate. 

You can see the full BBC London report here.

SHARE THE EVIDENCE

The cancellation of the Duathlon, which has been held annually for a number of years, is a great shame. London needs events like this, and environments such as Richmond Park, to inspire the next generation to cycle – an activity which is proven to reduce stress, improve physical health and ease traffic congestion.

Moreover, The Royal Parks has stated in its latest annual report that “there is no evidence to suggest that [our] parks are becoming unsafe”, attributing a rise in recorded incidents, including non-cycling accidents, to “improved reporting processes” (see p68). And as we have mentioned in this bulletin before, ONS statistics show that pedestrian deaths involving cyclists are incredibly rare, with only nine occurring nationally in five years.

Facts such as these will inform our ongoing dialogue with Darren Share, TRP’s Director of Parks, when RPC and Sean Epstein, our counterpart at Regent’s Park Cyclists, have our second meeting with him on Tuesday. All parties, including TRP, agree that an evidence-based approach is the way forward, and we aim to ensure that TRP’s future cycling policy fulfills the charity’s aim, stated on page six of its annual report, to “welcome everyone” – which should include those who cycle responsibly in sporting events.

ALL SYSTEMS ROE

The Royal Parks has now applied to Richmond Council for planning permission to build a new cafe at Roehampton Gate and redevelop the existing facilities in the vicinity. 

The council published the application on its website on Friday. The application document shows that spaces for cycle parking are intended to rise from 20 to 98. Construction is scheduled to take place from November next year until August 2026, and the estimated cost of the proposal is documented as “up to £2m”. A public consultation will now follow. 

As revealed in April’s RPC bulletin, we were consulted on the ideas for the redevelopment and made recommendations concerning cycling access, bike parking and road surfacing. We were pleased with the plans TRP’s representatives showed us at the time, and we look forward to examining them further as they develop.

GROUP EFFORT

A quick thank-you to all the clubs who have taken up our offer to publicise their group rides which take place in Richmond Park. We aim to compile a list of as many as possible for inclusion on our website, so if you have a ride which welcomes newcomers regardless of their skill level or experience, please get in touch so we can include you.

GETTING THE HUMP

Those of you who cycled into the park via Kingston Gate on Tuesday might have seen roadworks taking place on King’s Road. This was a consequence of what could be described as a concerned local, armed with a tape measure, discovering that the speed humps installed as part of the temporary one-way trial were slightly higher than the legal maximum and arguing that they could damage the undercarriage of cars (although they don’t appear to be a problem for the vast majority of motorists who pass over them at an appropriately sedate speed).

A letter from Kingston Council to residents, reproduced on the NextDoor forum, stated that its contractor had agreed at their own cost to bulldoze the humps and install new ones that are within the correct dimensions, which they apparently did on Tuesday. The three bumps on King’s Road were all of differing heights, the largest being 2.8cm higher than what the council set out as the standard maximum of 8cm. 

This episode illustrates that none of us should take the continuation of the one-way system in its present form for granted. Officially, it is only a temporary trial which could be amended or even scrapped by next year. So if, like us, you don’t want a return to the bad old days of encountering huge frustration, angry confrontations – including the occasional fist fight – and additional pollution on King’s Road as you cycle to and from the park, please take a few moments to fill in this petition, which was brought to our attention by the Friends of Kingston Gate.

The council’s Kingston and North Kingston Neighbourhood Committee is meeting on Thursday to decide if the traffic trial should “remain unchanged for the current time to allow further monitoring to be undertaken”, and there is an opportunity to submit petitions, which we assume is a chance for the organisers of the King’s Road petition to present theirs. You can read the agenda here, and have a look at the road data here, which seems to show there is little change to traffic levels overall compared to the period before the scheme began, and vehicles are now moving slower.

SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Our friends at Merton Sports and Social Club for Visually Impaired People tell us that they “reaped valuable benefits” and generally had a great response to an appeal for volunteers which appeared in the January edition of this bulletin.

The organisation, which is the only one of its kind in London, takes enthusiastic visually impaired local people on tandem rides, ranging from around Richmond Park to a 40-mile club run. They ride from the club’s base in Morden on the first Sunday and third Saturday of the month, although there is no minimum commitment for volunteers.

If you would like to be a tandem pilot, please email MSSC chair Terry Jones at tandemmanagement@mssc.org.uk so she can give you more details. Like some of your fellow RPC subscribers who are already involved, you are likely to find the rides exceptionally rewarding. 

BLAZING SADDLES

On a final note, a word on the safety of electric bikes from Richmond Fire Station, who got in touch with us last month. They say that self-combusting lithium batteries are the fastest-gowing risk in the capital, and fire officers attended one e-bike or e-scooter fire every two days on average last year. The majority of incidents occur within homes, and many are caused by incompatible chargers, bike modifications or faulty or counterfeit products purchased online.

Blazes of this kind can start in seconds. If you have an electric-powered bicycle, the brigade advises:

  • Don’t charge your batteries by your front door or any escape route

  • Never charge your batteries overnight

  • Only buy your batteries from a reputable seller

You can find out more, including the warning signs that your e-bike or battery is a potential hazard, by looking at the fire brigade’s information guide.

SEE YOU NEXT MONTH...

As ever, thank you for allowing us to pop into your inbox, and let us know what you think about anything related to cycling in Richmond Park – we reply personally to every email you send us. If you enjoyed this bulletin, please share it with your cycling friends – and if they like what they read, encourage them to sign up to our mailing list too. The more subscribers we have, the bigger our voice.

All the best,

Richmond Park Cyclists